Certified: The CISM Prepcast

Welcome to The Bare Metal Cyber CISM Prepcast. This series helps you prepare for the exam with focused explanations and practical context.
Security programs do not succeed on technical merit alone. They depend on visibility, authority, and organizational support—especially from those at the top. Gaining senior leadership commitment and stakeholder support is one of the most influential factors in shaping the maturity, effectiveness, and long-term sustainability of an information security program. Leadership commitment provides the funding, organizational influence, and policy enforcement power needed to operationalize controls, drive adoption, and maintain relevance in a rapidly evolving threat landscape. It sets the tone for the entire organization, signaling that security is a shared responsibility, not a side function. Leadership support encourages collaboration across departments and ensures that security objectives are prioritized alongside business goals. It also strengthens the organization’s ability to meet regulatory requirements, audit expectations, and strategic milestones by embedding risk awareness into decision-making. Without leadership commitment, security programs often stall in the face of competing priorities, budget constraints, or organizational inertia. But with it, they gain the momentum and credibility needed to function as true business enablers.
To secure meaningful commitment, it’s essential to first understand who the stakeholders are. Executive leadership teams—typically including the CEO, CFO, CIO, and COO—make decisions that influence corporate priorities, capital investments, and enterprise risk appetite. These leaders must understand how security aligns with their core responsibilities. Boards of directors and audit or risk committees provide strategic oversight and are increasingly held accountable for cybersecurity governance. Department heads, including line-of-business managers and operational directors, are critical for policy adoption, process implementation, and local compliance. Risk, legal, compliance, and human resources functions serve as partners for enforcement, awareness, and policy alignment. Even third parties—such as vendors and service providers—play a role in shaping or supporting the security strategy. Each of these roles must be identified, understood, and engaged based on their influence, expectations, and dependencies. A successful engagement plan begins with stakeholder mapping, followed by ongoing relationship management tailored to each group’s priorities.
Speaking the language of leadership is one of the most important skills security professionals can develop. Executives are focused on outcomes—business growth, operational continuity, brand protection, and regulatory standing. They evaluate risk not through technical indicators, but through business impact: lost revenue, service downtime, reputational harm, and shareholder value. When presenting to senior leaders, avoid technical jargon. Instead, frame security proposals in terms of return on investment, cost avoidance, and operational efficiency. Show how a particular control or initiative helps the business stay competitive, expand safely, or comply with complex regulatory landscapes. Explain how information protection supports innovation, customer trust, and workforce enablement. The goal is to shift the perception of security from a compliance cost or IT function to a strategic capability that enables the organization to grow, innovate, and operate confidently in the face of risk.
Building trust and credibility with leadership is a long-term effort. Security leaders must deliver on commitments, follow through on timelines, and demonstrate that they can manage both technical execution and strategic communication. Reports should be data-driven, but not overwhelming. Visual dashboards, summaries, and clear recommendations are more useful than raw metrics or highly technical language. Transparency is essential—acknowledge limitations, trade-offs, and risks honestly. If a project is behind schedule, explain why. If a control failed, provide a clear remediation plan. Credibility is built when leaders see that security is aligned with the organization, understands business priorities, and can manage complexity responsibly. Referencing external frameworks, benchmarks, or third-party assessments can further validate proposals and help build executive confidence in the program’s direction and performance.
Securing ongoing engagement from executives requires structured, proactive communication. Regular briefings—whether monthly, quarterly, or tied to governance events—should include tailored metrics that align with enterprise objectives. These metrics might include time to contain high-risk incidents, audit remediation progress, or improvements in detection coverage. Executives should also be invited to participate in key security events—such as tabletop exercises, strategic reviews, or incident response simulations. Align security roadmaps with broader strategic planning cycles so that funding and resourcing can be considered early. Elevate key risks and emerging threats in board and audit committee meetings using business-relevant narratives. Finally, position senior leaders not only as approvers, but as champions. Their support for security awareness campaigns, policy enforcement, and program accountability drives organizational culture and reinforces the idea that cybersecurity is a priority from the top down.
Stakeholders beyond the executive team must also be brought into the fold. Security teams should work with department heads to assign clear roles for policy enforcement, access control adherence, and training participation. These stakeholders should be involved early in strategy development, technology evaluations, and process redesign efforts. Including their perspectives ensures that controls are feasible, context-sensitive, and more likely to be adopted. When risks or compliance concerns are discovered, engaging the relevant stakeholders directly leads to faster, more accurate resolution. Recognizing and addressing department-specific constraints also builds goodwill. Highlighting how stakeholder engagement improves overall risk posture—both in terms of local operations and enterprise exposure—can increase cooperation and encourage shared responsibility.
To maintain support, security leaders must communicate the impact of their programs clearly and consistently. Regular reports should show how control effectiveness, compliance rates, and incident detection timelines are improving. Visuals, such as dashboards and role-based summaries, help stakeholders understand performance without getting bogged down in detail. Metrics should connect directly to business outcomes—highlighting how investments have reduced risk, enabled compliance, or improved resilience. Early wins and long-term progress should be acknowledged. Repeating the message that stakeholder support is a key driver of this success reinforces the value of their involvement and encourages continued commitment. Including emerging threats in updates also maintains stakeholder attention and demonstrates that the security team is keeping pace with the evolving landscape.
Barriers to leadership commitment and stakeholder support are common, but they can be addressed through planning and empathy. Executives may experience fatigue from competing priorities, especially if security is positioned solely as a cost center. To counter this, frame proposals in terms of strategic value and business risk mitigation. Address vague or overlapping responsibilities by clearly defining who owns which policies, actions, or decisions. When departments feel uncertain or overloaded, offer phased approaches, incremental wins, and concrete timelines to make participation manageable. Be transparent about the limitations and trade-offs involved in proposed initiatives, and invite stakeholders to shape solutions rather than simply approving them. When resistance arises, respond with facts, empathy, and an understanding of the broader organizational pressures at play. Security is not the only function asking for support—so being adaptable, informed, and respectful earns credibility and cooperation.
Formal mechanisms for commitment help convert verbal support into structured action. Security should be integrated into strategic planning and enterprise risk management processes so that cybersecurity is considered during capital planning, innovation roadmaps, and major business decisions. Written approvals should be obtained for key budget requests, policy changes, and control deployments. Governance bodies such as steering committees or review boards provide an effective forum for sustained oversight and cross-functional alignment. Roles and responsibilities should be documented in charters, service-level agreements, or control frameworks that make support and accountability visible and enforceable. These structures ensure that leadership involvement is not ad hoc—it is built into the way the organization operates, decides, and governs.
Sustaining support over time requires ongoing communication, relationship management, and strategic alignment. Security leaders should re-engage executives and stakeholders regularly with updates that include threat intelligence insights, program milestones, and control improvements. Reports should highlight stories of success—such as risk reductions, improved audit outcomes, or successful response to emerging threats. These updates should be concise, impactful, and forward-looking. Soliciting feedback from stakeholders about the program’s effectiveness and responsiveness helps shape future efforts and demonstrates that leadership input is valued. Public recognition of supportive leaders—through presentations, scorecards, or reports—reinforces positive behavior and encourages others to get involved. Future initiatives must be aligned with evolving business priorities so that security remains relevant. Security must evolve with the organization’s structure, risk profile, and strategic vision—continually earning its place at the leadership table.
Thanks for joining us for this episode of The Bare Metal Cyber CISM Prepcast. For more episodes, tools, and study support, visit us at Bare Metal Cyber dot com.