Certified: The CISM Prepcast

Welcome to The Bare Metal Cyber CISM Prepcast. This series helps you prepare for the exam with focused explanations and practical context.
A business continuity plan ensures that an organization can continue performing its most critical functions even when facing severe disruptions. Whether the cause is a cyberattack, a power outage, or a natural disaster, the plan helps minimize downtime and protect essential services. A well-developed BCP supports the organization's overall viability, reinforces its reputation, and strengthens its compliance posture by demonstrating preparedness. It builds organizational resilience by proactively planning for recovery, rather than responding reactively. While it complements incident response and disaster recovery plans, its focus is broader—addressing not only system-level recovery but also the continuity of business operations during unpredictable interruptions.
Unlike incident response or disaster recovery plans, a business continuity plan addresses the continued functioning of the organization as a whole. While disaster recovery focuses on restoring IT systems and incident response handles immediate security threats, BCPs concentrate on maintaining essential business activities throughout a crisis. The scope of a BCP is wider, encompassing not just technology but also processes, personnel, facilities, and supply chains. It must align with the organization’s overarching risk and resilience strategies to provide a unified defense. These three plans—BCP, IRP, and DRP—must be tightly coordinated so that each supports the others without redundancy or contradiction, ensuring that the organization’s response is both comprehensive and efficient.
Several critical inputs drive the business continuity planning process, beginning with the results of the business impact analysis, which identifies which functions are most critical and prioritizes recovery efforts. Risk assessments provide insights into likely threats that could disrupt operations, ranging from cyber threats to physical hazards. Legal, regulatory, and contractual obligations influence the required scope and rigor of continuity efforts. Detailed process maps help clarify the operational dependencies that must be preserved during an event. Finally, input from executive leadership is essential to ensure the plan’s alignment with strategic goals and to gain organizational support for implementation and resource allocation.
Clearly defining the objectives and scope of a BCP helps ensure it is effective and actionable. The plan must specify which business functions are considered essential and what recovery timelines are expected for each. Coverage should be mapped across geographies, departments, and systems to ensure no critical area is left unaddressed. Objectives must be consistent with the organization’s tolerance for disruption and its overall risk posture. The plan should also state explicitly what it does not cover to avoid confusion during execution. Documenting stakeholder responsibilities and outlining expectations for plan performance ensures everyone involved knows their role in maintaining continuity.
Developing continuity strategies means thinking through practical ways to keep the organization operating when normal conditions are no longer available. This includes identifying alternate work locations, which may involve enabling remote work or relying on pre-established hot or cold sites. It may be necessary to define manual alternatives to automated processes so that core functions can continue even without system access. Communication strategies for staff, customers, and partners must be in place to maintain transparency and manage expectations. Supply chain continuity must also be addressed, either by securing alternative vendors or by maintaining critical inventories. Finally, the organization must define which recovery roles are handled internally and which require outside support during a disruption.
A well-written BCP document provides clarity and guidance during a crisis. It must include foundational elements such as the plan’s purpose, scope, and the assumptions that inform its design. Activation criteria should be clearly stated so teams know when to initiate continuity procedures. The document should outline recovery strategies, identify key contacts, and assign team responsibilities. Checklists and workflow instructions for each critical business function ensure that response activities are orderly and consistent. Predefined communication templates and instructions for coordinating with vendors are also essential. Appendices should include detailed inventories of dependencies, required tools, and other supporting resources to make execution as smooth as possible.
Assigning clear roles and responsibilities is essential for ensuring that the BCP functions as intended. A continuity manager or BCP coordinator should oversee the entire program and act as the point of contact during disruptions. Functional leaders from each department must be assigned to lead recovery teams for their areas of responsibility. Supporting functions—such as human resources, legal, facilities, and communications—must also have defined roles during a business continuity event. Escalation procedures must be built into the plan so that key decisions can be made quickly when required. All essential roles must have designated backups documented in the plan to ensure that responsibilities are covered even if primary staff are unavailable.
Integration with other organizational plans ensures that the BCP supports, and is supported by, other elements of the security and resilience framework. It must align closely with the disaster recovery plan to ensure that system-level recovery timelines are consistent with business needs. The BCP should coordinate with the incident response plan to ensure seamless transitions from threat containment to operational continuity. Integration with enterprise risk management processes and compliance reporting structures ensures that continuity is treated as a strategic priority. Connections must also be made to vendor risk management to confirm that external partners can meet continuity expectations. Testing, training, and update schedules must be aligned across all plans to avoid gaps and ensure consistency.
Regular testing of the BCP confirms its effectiveness and ensures that teams remain prepared. Testing should include tabletop scenarios for discussion-based validation, functional drills for process verification, and full simulations for comprehensive evaluation. Exercises should include a range of disruption types, such as facility outages, data center failures, or pandemics, to test diverse recovery pathways. During each test, performance should be measured against defined recovery time objectives and communication benchmarks to identify gaps or delays. All lessons learned must be documented and used to update the plan. Both technical and business workflows must be tested to ensure the plan reflects real-world operations and is not limited to theory.
To remain useful, the BCP must be reviewed and maintained on a regular schedule. Annual reviews are standard, but additional updates should be made following major changes such as system migrations, staffing shifts, or updated regulations. Contact lists, recovery procedures, and interdependencies should be verified and revised as needed. Continuity strategies should be reassessed in light of new risk findings or changing business conditions. Any new legal or regulatory requirements that affect recovery expectations must be incorporated. The maintenance process should be embedded within the organization’s broader security governance framework, ensuring that the BCP remains a living document that reflects the current state of the organization and its operating environment.
Thanks for joining us for this episode of The Bare Metal Cyber CISM Prepcast. For more episodes, tools, and study support, visit us at Bare Metal Cyber dot com.